Blog / Analysis workflows

Analysis workflows

How to Automate Airfoil Polar Generation Across Multiple Reynolds Numbers

HENDOI · 26 October 2026

A Reynolds-number sweep is a matrix: one geometry, one method, one transition policy, many Re. Automation stores every converged point with its Re, and it leaves the failed points failed.

The sweep is data, not a loop buried in a script

The automated-workflow lesson is the whole pipeline, from the geometry gate to the stored record. A Reynolds-number sweep is the piece of that pipeline that people run most often and label least carefully. The lift and drag across Reynolds number lesson says why the coefficients move. This lesson is how to produce the family of polars so a later reader can tell them apart.

  1. Freeze the geometry hash. A sweep that “cleans” the coordinates on the third Reynolds number is three airfoils.
  2. Choose the Reynolds numbers from the flight, including a neighbor a factor of about two away if you need to see whether the result is sensitive. Do not pick a round million because the box was empty.
  3. Hold Mach number and the transition policy fixed, or declare them as further columns. A clean polar at one Re against a tripped polar at the next is not a Reynolds-number effect.
  4. Use one angle list. Then the curves overlie in angle and a missing point is visible.
  5. Name the method on every row. A VIC polar and an inviscid panel preview do not belong in the same sweep under one legend.
  6. Keep non-converged angles as gaps. Do not copy the previous angle’s lift into the hole, and do not spline across a stall the solver refused.

Plot CD at one or two fixed lift coefficients against Reynolds number, as well as the full polars. The slice shows the trend. The polars show whether the trend was a bucket moving, a bubble, or a stall. Archive the config file with the table. A sweep that cannot be rerun from that config was not automated.


Where this sits in the series

In simple words: what this page is for

A Reynolds-number sweep is a matrix: one geometry, one method, one transition policy, many Re. Automation stores every converged point with its Re, and it leaves the failed points failed.

This lesson exists because section decisions fail when geometry, method labels and selection reasons are scattered. How to Automate Airfoil Polar Generation Across Multiple Reynolds Numbers helps you keep a clean trail from shape to polar to choice.

Why the topic matters

Engineers lose time when a title sounds clear but the page only sketches the idea. This article expands How to Automate Airfoil Polar Generation Across Multiple Reynolds Numbers so you can answer three questions without jargon: what is the idea, when do you use it, and how do you check it in a HENDOI product.

Read the sections above for the core definitions. Use the steps below to move from reading into a real project trail you can share with a teammate.

How to apply this in HENDOI

In practice: create a HENDOI account or log in, open HENFOIL, bring a section in (create, import DAT, or digitize), pass the geometry gate, climb the analysis ladder only as far as the decision needs, then compare and archive. Every calculated number should keep its method label.

When the section choice is ready for the aircraft, continue in HENSYNTH for mission, compliance and trades. Same account. Same plans.

What this page will not claim: a teaching polar or geometry note is not a flight-Re certificate. HENFOIL labels methods so you know what you bought. Tunnel data and professional judgement still sit outside any single software run.

Checklist before you leave this page

  • Can you state the idea of How to Automate Airfoil Polar Generation Across Multiple Reynolds Numbers in one sentence?
  • Do you know which product owns the next action — HENFOIL or HENSYNTH?
  • Will every number you keep carry a method label or a stored-run source?
  • If you are new here, have you opened Register or Login?

These pages teach the ideas. They are not wind-tunnel data and not a certification analysis. When a number matters, compute it at a stated Reynolds number, Mach number and transition setting, and keep the method label on the result. In HENFOIL that production polar is a VIC polar — see the analysis ladder and the polar field guide.

Both products live

Use this lesson in the HENDOI workspace

This page sits in Analysis workflows. HENFOIL and HENSYNTH are both live on one account. These articles are screening lessons — not certification reports.

Live · section

HENFOIL

Turn this lesson into a section you can draw, check, analyse and compare. Run the polar at the Reynolds number of the vehicle. The method name stays on the result.

To Know More

Live · aircraft

HENSYNTH

After the section is chosen, set geometry and mission requirements, run screening, read compliance, synthesize candidates and download or mail the report.

To Know More

Aerospace industry collaboration

Share thoughts and ideas — help us build better solutions

We are looking for aerospace industry collaboration. Share your thoughts, ideas and real workflow challenges so we can improve our products and deliver the best solutions for OEMs, UAV / eVTOL teams, labs and aeronautical engineering companies.

Written by

Sundarapandi Muthupandi, Founder and CEO of HENDOI

This post by

Sundarapandi Muthupandi

Founder & CEO · HENDOI

Click to visit my profile

Related articles

Call usChat with us