Airfoil applications
How to Select an Airfoil for Electric Aircraft and eVTOL Applications
HENDOI · 27 October 2026
Battery energy makes cruise L/D expensive to waste. eVTOL adds a second problem: sections and rotors that must behave in hover, in transition and in wing-borne flight.
The energy budget changes the weighting
A battery carries far less energy per kilogram than fuel, and it does not get lighter as you fly. Profile drag and induced drag are paid for the whole mission out of a fixed energy store. For a wing-borne electric aircraft the section question is still the airplane question: L/D of the aircraft at the cruise CL, of which the section L/D is one piece, plus a stall margin for landing when you cannot go around forever. Chasing a tiny clean-section drag gain that costs spar depth, and therefore wing weight, and therefore induced drag, is a good way to lose range.
Compute the Reynolds number from the real chord and the real cruise speed. Many training and light electric aircraft sit at modest Re compared with a turboprop of the same drawing. Many small eVTOL lifting surfaces sit lower still. Use that Re. A section selected at transport-aircraft Reynolds number is a different object.
Three aerodynamic jobs on an eVTOL
| Job | Section problem |
|---|---|
| Wing-borne cruise | Same as any electric airplane: design-CL L/D, moment the tail or the canard can trim, gentle enough stall, a tripped polar that still works in rain. |
| Hover and lift rotors | The “airfoil” is a rotor-blade section. It cares about L/D at the local blade Re, about moment for torsion, about a trailing edge that does not whistle, and about Mach number at the tip. A wing section pasted onto a rotor is a coincidence, not a design. |
| Transition | The wing may see large angles, propeller slipstream, and a partially stalled state on the way from hover to wing-borne flight. A steady cruise polar does not describe that minute of the mission. If loads or control in transition matter, they need an unsteady or vehicle-level method. Do not invent them from CL max. |
Noise and the neighbour
eVTOL sections and rotor blades are chosen in public. Tip speed, blade loading, trailing-edge thickness and whether the blade is separated in climb all show up in noise. A quiet rotor is mostly a slower tip and a careful planform. The airfoil still has to support that operating point with an attached boundary layer and a thin trailing edge. Quote noise from an acoustic calculation or a test. Quote the section from its polar. Keep the two sentences separate so a low CD is not mistaken for a certificate of quiet.
A practical short list
- Freeze cruise CL, Re and Mach for the wing. Freeze local Re and Mach for the rotor stations. They are different sheets of paper.
- Demand a thickness the structure can use. Electric wings still have spars; electric rotors still have to hold a blade.
- Score clean and tripped polars. Urban operations are dirty, wet and full of insects.
- Score CM. Distributed propulsion does not delete trim, and a canard or a tandem wing has its own moment balance.
- For the rotor, look at the high-Re tip and the low-Re root separately, and look at trailing-edge thickness on purpose.
- Leave transition-flight loads as a labelled gap unless you have a method that covers them.
HENFOIL is the section screen for that short list: geometry, VIC polars, compare, and a record of Re, Mach and transition. The vehicle energy model and the acoustic model sit downstream of those polars and should cite them.
Where this sits in the series
In simple words: what this page is for
Battery energy makes cruise L/D expensive to waste. eVTOL adds a second problem: sections and rotors that must behave in hover, in transition and in wing-borne flight.
This lesson exists because section decisions fail when geometry, method labels and selection reasons are scattered. How to Select an Airfoil for Electric Aircraft and eVTOL Applications helps you keep a clean trail from shape to polar to choice.
Why the topic matters
Engineers lose time when a title sounds clear but the page only sketches the idea. This article expands How to Select an Airfoil for Electric Aircraft and eVTOL Applications so you can answer three questions without jargon: what is the idea, when do you use it, and how do you check it in a HENDOI product.
Read the sections above for the core definitions. Use the steps below to move from reading into a real project trail you can share with a teammate.
How to apply this in HENDOI
In practice: create a HENDOI account or log in, open HENFOIL, bring a section in (create, import DAT, or digitize), pass the geometry gate, climb the analysis ladder only as far as the decision needs, then compare and archive. Every calculated number should keep its method label.
When the section choice is ready for the aircraft, continue in HENSYNTH for mission, compliance and trades. Same account. Same plans.
What this page will not claim: a teaching polar or geometry note is not a flight-Re certificate. HENFOIL labels methods so you know what you bought. Tunnel data and professional judgement still sit outside any single software run.
Checklist before you leave this page
- Can you state the idea of How to Select an Airfoil for Electric Aircraft and eVTOL Applications in one sentence?
- Do you know which product owns the next action — HENFOIL or HENSYNTH?
- Will every number you keep carry a method label or a stored-run source?
- If you are new here, have you opened Register or Login?
Related reading on this site
- HENSYNTH range and endurance screening for electric cruise
- HENSYNTH electric UAV mission screening loop
- How to Evaluate Airfoils for Small Electric Propeller Aircraft
- All HENDOI blog articles
- HENFOIL product page
- HENSYNTH product page
- Pricing — Student, Professional & Team
- FAQ
- Login · Register now
- Previous: Airfoil selection for wind turbine blades
- Next: Airfoil analysis vs CFD
- Index: all HENFOIL airfoil lessons
These pages teach the ideas. They are not wind-tunnel data and not a certification analysis. When a number matters, compute it at a stated Reynolds number, Mach number and transition setting, and keep the method label on the result. In HENFOIL that production polar is a VIC polar — see the analysis ladder and the polar field guide.
Both products live
Use this lesson in the HENDOI workspace
This page sits in Airfoil applications. HENFOIL and HENSYNTH are both live on one account. These articles are screening lessons — not certification reports.
Live · section
HENFOIL
Turn this lesson into a section you can draw, check, analyse and compare. Run the polar at the Reynolds number of the vehicle. The method name stays on the result.
To Know MoreLive · aircraft
HENSYNTH
After the section is chosen, set geometry and mission requirements, run screening, read compliance, synthesize candidates and download or mail the report.
To Know MoreAerospace industry collaboration
Share thoughts and ideas — help us build better solutions
We are looking for aerospace industry collaboration. Share your thoughts, ideas and real workflow challenges so we can improve our products and deliver the best solutions for OEMs, UAV / eVTOL teams, labs and aeronautical engineering companies.
Written by

Related articles
- Airfoil Selection for Wind Turbine Blades: Key Aerodynamic Considerations
A turbine blade is many airfoils. The root is a thick structure, the outer board is a high-lift machine, and the tip has to stay efficient when it is dirty and quiet enough to site.
- Airfoil Analysis vs CFD: Differences, Advantages and Limitations
A viscous panel polar and a Navier–Stokes solution are different instruments. Use the fast one to search. Use the expensive one when the physics leaves the fast one’s assumptions.
- From Airfoil Analysis to Aircraft Design: Connecting 2D Profiles to 3D Wings
A wing is a spanwise family of sections, twisted and tapered, flying in its own induced flow. The section polar is the input. It is not the airplane.