How-to
Geometry Doctor results: metrics, scores and PASS / WARNING / FAIL
HENDOI · 26 October 2026
What t/c, camber, LE radius, TE state, CST residual, polar readiness scores mean — and why you should fix FAIL before climbing the analysis ladder.
Why geometry comes first
A spiked LE, crossed TE, undersampled camber or noisy digitize invents lift and drag long before VIC deserves the blame. Geometry Doctor (the quality gate) decides whether analysis may proceed honestly.
After Create, Import or Digitize: inspect → repair → repanel → normalize as needed, then read the gate.
Core section metrics (what they mean)
| Metric | Purpose | Why you care |
|---|---|---|
| Max t/c (and station) | Thickness ratio | Spar depth, packing, drag |
| Max camber (and station) | Camber magnitude / location | Design lift and pitching behaviour |
| r_LE / c | Leading-edge radius / chord | Stall gentleness, nose resolution for solvers |
| TE t/c | Trailing-edge thickness | Closure for panels / FEA / manufacturing |
Result. Numbers on the section card and in digitize quality panels after Reconstruct. If they disagree with the drawing you thought you traced, fix the source — do not “hope the polar averages it out.”
Gate statuses
| Status | Meaning | What you should do |
|---|---|---|
| PASS | Checks cleared for the next rung | Proceed; keep the PASS on the trail |
| WARNING | Proceed only if you understand the risk | Document why; fix if the risk is unnecessary |
| FAIL | Not honest enough for the polar path | Repair / repanel / re-digitize before Sweep |
FAIL blocks the polar path until you fix the section. WARNING keeps the warning visible — it does not erase it.
Quality / readiness scores (digitize & geometry)
After digitize Reconstruct (and similar geometry packs) you may see scores such as:
| Signal | Purpose |
|---|---|
| CST residual score | How well a CST fit matches the shape |
| DAT export score | Suitability for clean DAT export |
| Polar Mach suggested / Mach gate | Suggested Mach band and readiness |
| Suggested AoA lo…hi and Δα | Reasonable first polar window |
| Camber fairness / LE arc / LE fit | Nose and camber smoothness |
| Thickness-function / camber-median tolerance | Distribution honesty |
| Ready-for-* flags** | Booleans for polar Mach, camber tolerance, etc. |
How to use them. Treat suggestions as a starting polar recipe, not as certification limits. A high DAT score does not mean the foil is “good” aerodynamically — only that export geometry is orderly.
What the gate checks (checklist)
- Thickness ratio and camber distribution sanity
- Leading-edge radius and nose resolution
- Trailing-edge state (open, crossed, collapsed)
- Curvature smoothness and local spikes
- CST / PARSEC fit residual when those parameterizations apply
Results land with a reason you can act on — not a silent boolean.
Import path extras
Selig / Lednicer DAT: inspect → repair → repanel. Import is not “load and hope.” Conditioning decides whether analysis may proceed. The same PASS / WARNING / FAIL language applies.
Expected workflow result
- Metrics you can quote in a datasheet
- A gate decision with reasons
- Optional repairs that change the ordinate trail (documented)
- Permission — engineering, not legal — to climb thin-airfoil → panel → VIC
Honesty reminder
Skipping conditioning does not save time. It exports noise into compare, optimize and review. The quality gate exists so selection starts from geometry you can defend.
In simple words: what this page is for
What t/c, camber, LE radius, TE state, CST residual, polar readiness scores mean — and why you should fix FAIL before climbing the analysis ladder.
This lesson exists because section decisions fail when geometry, method labels and selection reasons are scattered. Geometry Doctor results: metrics, scores and PASS / WARNING / FAIL helps you keep a clean trail from shape to polar to choice.
Why the topic matters
Engineers lose time when a title sounds clear but the page only sketches the idea. This article expands Geometry Doctor results: metrics, scores and PASS / WARNING / FAIL so you can answer three questions without jargon: what is the idea, when do you use it, and how do you check it in a HENDOI product.
Read the sections above for the core definitions. Use the steps below to move from reading into a real project trail you can share with a teammate.
How to apply this in HENDOI
In practice: create a HENDOI account or log in, open HENFOIL, bring a section in (create, import DAT, or digitize), pass the geometry gate, climb the analysis ladder only as far as the decision needs, then compare and archive. Every calculated number should keep its method label.
When the section choice is ready for the aircraft, continue in HENSYNTH for mission, compliance and trades. Same account. Same plans.
What this page will not claim: a teaching polar or geometry note is not a flight-Re certificate. HENFOIL labels methods so you know what you bought. Tunnel data and professional judgement still sit outside any single software run.
Checklist before you leave this page
- Can you state the idea of Geometry Doctor results: metrics, scores and PASS / WARNING / FAIL in one sentence?
- Do you know which product owns the next action — HENFOIL or HENSYNTH?
- Will every number you keep carry a method label or a stored-run source?
- If you are new here, have you opened Register or Login?
Related reading on this site
- Airfoil selection with a documented why-#1
- The HENFOIL analysis ladder: when to escalate
- Create airfoil fields: NACA, analytic and CST — what each digit means
- Digitize field-by-field: every control, why fill it, what you get
- All HENDOI blog articles
- HENFOIL product page
- HENSYNTH product page
- Pricing — Student, Professional & Team
- FAQ
- Login · Register now
Both products live
Use this lesson in the HENDOI workspace
This page sits in How-to. HENFOIL and HENSYNTH are both live on one account. These articles are screening lessons — not certification reports.
Live · section
HENFOIL
Turn this lesson into a section you can draw, check, analyse and compare. Run the polar at the Reynolds number of the vehicle. The method name stays on the result.
To Know MoreLive · aircraft
HENSYNTH
After the section is chosen, set geometry and mission requirements, run screening, read compliance, synthesize candidates and download or mail the report.
To Know MoreAerospace industry collaboration
Share thoughts and ideas — help us build better solutions
We are looking for aerospace industry collaboration. Share your thoughts, ideas and real workflow challenges so we can improve our products and deliver the best solutions for OEMs, UAV / eVTOL teams, labs and aeronautical engineering companies.
Written by

Related articles
- HENSYNTH Reports: analyze PDF and stored runs
How to download the latest HENSYNTH analyze PDF, list stored runs, and mail a conceptual screening summary from the Reports page.
- HENSYNTH Analysis: Mission, Performance, Trades and Optimize
After Requirements and Synthesize, open HENSYNTH Mission, Performance, Trades and Optimize for stored predictions, mission-opt grids, sweeps and conceptual range search.
- HENSYNTH workflow: dashboard to technical report
End-to-end HENSYNTH help path: dashboard project, Aircraft geometry, Requirements, Run screening, compliance, Synthesize, candidate apply, zip report, HEN-AI.