How to Create Reproducible Airfoil Simulation Reports for Engineering Teams

The figure is not the record

A plot can be redrawn. A conclusion cannot be checked unless the inputs sit in the same document as the plot. The validation workflow is the order of a comparison with a test. The automated workflow is how the run is produced. A report for a team is the human-readable form of that record. If someone who did not write the script cannot regenerate the polar, the report is a presentation.

What the report contains

1. The geometry hash, the source file name, the normalization, and the trailing-edge rule. A picture of the section is welcome and is not a substitute.
2. The method name, the version, and the discretization: panel count, or the mesh identifier. “CFD” is not a method name.
3. Reynolds number, Mach number, angle list, and transition, including any amplification setting. Write the value even when it is the code’s default. Defaults change.
4. Which points converged, which were dropped, and the residual or the failure flag. The outlier checks are part of the report, not a private filter.
5. The coefficient table at the declared moment reference, and a statement that the figure was plotted from that table.
6. If a measurement is shown, the test conditions and the corrections, and a statement of what was not tuned to improve the overlay.

Keep the config beside the report. A PDF that embeds neither the coordinates nor the settings cannot be reproduced when the default Ncrit changes next year. These pages are teaching notes. A report that will be used for a design decision still has to say that it is an analysis at stated conditions, not a certification result. Reproducible and approved are different claims. Only the first one is earned by the record.

---

Where this sits in the series

In simple words: what this page is for

A reproducible report is one a colleague can rerun from the record: geometry hash, method, freestream, transition, residuals, and the table the figure was drawn from.

This lesson exists because section decisions fail when geometry, method labels and selection reasons are scattered. How to Create Reproducible Airfoil Simulation Reports for Engineering Teams helps you keep a clean trail from shape to polar to choice.

Why the topic matters

Engineers lose time when a title sounds clear but the page only sketches the idea. This article expands How to Create Reproducible Airfoil Simulation Reports for Engineering Teams so you can answer three questions without jargon: what is the idea, when do you use it, and how do you check it in a HENDOI product.

Read the sections above for the core definitions. Use the steps below to move from reading into a real project trail you can share with a teammate.

How to apply this in HENDOI

In practice: create a HENDOI account or log in, open HENFOIL, bring a section in (create, import DAT, or digitize), pass the geometry gate, climb the analysis ladder only as far as the decision needs, then compare and archive. Every calculated number should keep its method label.

When the section choice is ready for the aircraft, continue in HENSYNTH for mission, compliance and trades. Same account. Same plans.

What this page will not claim: a teaching polar or geometry note is not a flight-Re certificate. HENFOIL labels methods so you know what you bought. Tunnel data and professional judgement still sit outside any single software run.

Checklist before you leave this page

• Can you state the idea of How to Create Reproducible Airfoil Simulation Reports for Engineering Teams in one sentence?
• Do you know which product owns the next action — HENFOIL or HENSYNTH?
• Will every number you keep carry a method label or a stored-run source?
• If you are new here, have you opened Register or Login?

Related reading on this site

• Active Flow Control on Airfoils: Suction, Blowing and Synthetic Jets
• How Adverse Pressure Gradients Affect Airfoil Boundary Layer Separation
• What Is the Aerodynamic Center of an Airfoil? Location, Meaning and Applications
• What Is Airfoil Aerodynamic Efficiency Across a Range of Flight Conditions?
• All HENDOI blog articles
• HENFOIL product page
• HENSYNTH product page
• Pricing — Student, Professional & Team
• FAQ
• Login · Register now

• Previous: Airfoil solver benchmarking
• Next: Trainer-aircraft airfoil selection
• Index: all HENFOIL airfoil lessons

These pages teach the ideas. They are not wind-tunnel data and not a certification analysis. When a number matters, compute it at a stated Reynolds number, Mach number and transition setting, and keep the method label on the result. In HENFOIL that production polar is a VIC polar — see the analysis ladder and the polar field guide.